Matter of Whitehead v. DiNapoli

132 A.D.3d 1224, 18 N.Y.S.3d 365
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 2015
Docket520745
StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.3d 1224 (Matter of Whitehead v. DiNapoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Whitehead v. DiNapoli, 132 A.D.3d 1224, 18 N.Y.S.3d 365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Egan Jr., J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller denying petitioner’s application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a correction officer, was injured in September 2009 when he struck his head on a wall-mounted metal toolbox while attempting to subdue an inmate. Petitioner did not return to work and, in April 2011, applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits. The application was denied, and petitioner sought a hearing and redetermination. At the conclusion of the hearing that followed, the Hearing Officer upheld the initial denial, finding that petitioner’s permanent incapacitation was not the natural and proximate result of the September 2009 incident. Respondent Comptroller agreed, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the Comptroller’s determination.

By letter dated May 14, 2015, respondents conceded that the Comptroller’s determination is not supported by substantial evidence. Upon our independent review of the record, we agree. Accordingly, the underlying determination is annulled (see Matter of Hokes v DiNapoli, 106 AD3d 1365, 1365 [2013]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is annulled, with costs, petition granted and matter remitted to respondents for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hokes v. DiNapoli
106 A.D.3d 1365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.3d 1224, 18 N.Y.S.3d 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-whitehead-v-dinapoli-nyappdiv-2015.