Matter of White v. Prack

131 A.D.3d 1333, 16 N.Y.S.3d 786
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 24, 2015
Docket520464
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 A.D.3d 1333 (Matter of White v. Prack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of White v. Prack, 131 A.D.3d 1333, 16 N.Y.S.3d 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with attempted assault on staff, making threats, creating a disturbance and disobeying a direct order. According to the misbehav *1334 ior report, petitioner became agitated and loud while being escorted to a medical transport and disregarded orders to stop approaching the correction officers. Petitioner then lunged at a correction officer, requiring force to be used to restrain petitioner. The incident delayed the transport of the other inmates in the area preparing for the medical trips. Following a hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officers involved, related documentation and the videotape of the incident provided substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Wilson v Annucci, 129 AD3d 1422, 1422 [2015]; Matter of Lamphear v Fischer, 76 AD3d 1166, 1166 [2010]). Petitioner’s testimony that he did not engage in the alleged conduct created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Beasley v Venettozzi, 122 AD3d 1038, 1038 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Garry and Rose, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Watkins v. Prack
133 A.D.3d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.D.3d 1333, 16 N.Y.S.3d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-white-v-prack-nyappdiv-2015.