MATTER OF WE'RE ASSOCS. CO. v. Bear

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF WE'RE ASSOCS. CO. v. Bear

272 N.E.2d 338, 28 N.Y.2d 981

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 272 N.E.2d 338 (MATTER OF WE'RE ASSOCS. CO. v. Bear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF WE'RE ASSOCS. CO. v. Bear, 272 N.E.2d 338, 28 N.Y.2d 981 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

28 N.Y.2d 981 (1971)

In the Matter of We're Associates Company, Respondent,
v.
Franklin Bear et al., Constituting the Nassau County Planning Commission, Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.)
In the Matter of the Town of North Hempstead, Respondent,
v.
Franklin Bear et al., Constituting the Nassau County Planning Commission, Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 10, 1971. Decided May 26, 1971.

Joseph Jaspan, County Attorney (Benedict F. Romano and F. Stuart Darrow of counsel), for appellants.

Stephen Van R. Ulman for We're Associates Company, respondent.

Francis F. Doran, Town Attorney (Gino Papa of counsel), for Town of North Hempstead, respondent.

Pratt, Caemmerer & Cleary for Incorporated Villages of Brookville, North Hills, Old Westbury and Roslyn Harbor, amici curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI