MATTER OF WEIN v. Thomas
414 N.E.2d 399, 51 N.Y.2d 862, 433 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2709
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. We cannot say that the determination of the Appellate Division was erroneous as a matter of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF WEIN v. Thomas, 414 N.E.2d 399, 51 N.Y.2d 862, 433 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2709 (N.Y. 1980).
414 N.E.2d 399 (MATTER OF WEIN v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rotanelli v. Westchester County Board of Elections
41 Misc. 3d 254 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Munoz v. Reyes
40 A.D.3d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Sloan v. Graham
10 A.D.3d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Sloan v. Knapp
10 A.D.3d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Hawkins v. Szczesniak
309 A.D.2d 1307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Eisenhauer v. Sarrabia
178 Misc. 2d 95 (Nassau County District Court, 1998)
People v. Damsky
177 Misc. 2d 828 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
Miller v. Bank of New York
226 A.D.2d 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Zamar v. Fair
153 Misc. 2d 913 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1991)
Plantech Housing, Inc. v. Conlan
414 N.E.2d 398 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)