Matter of Wasserstein v. McCarthy

2017 NY Slip Op 943, 147 A.D.3d 464, 46 N.Y.S.3d 414
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2017·No. 3035 3034 3033 3032 3031 3030 3029·Published

Opinion

Appeals from decrees, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Nora S. Anderson, S.), entered on or about May 22, 2015, which approved petitioner trustees’ proposed distributions, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from nonappealable decrees.

Respondent failed to file objections to petitioners’ accounts, thereby defaulting in this proceeding (see Matter of E. & H. Goldstein Family Trust, 81 AD3d 728 [2d Dept 2011]). No appeal lies from an order entered upon default (CPLR 5511; see e.g. Matter of Dietz, 29 NY2d 915 [1972]; Goldstein, 81 AD3d at 729).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Wasserstein v. McCarthy, 2017 NY Slip Op 943, 147 A.D.3d 464, 46 N.Y.S.3d 414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 943 (Matter of Wasserstein v. McCarthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Dietz
279 N.E.2d 607 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
In re E. & H. Goldstein Family Trust
81 A.D.3d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)