Matter of Walker v. Annucci

2018 NY Slip Op 2860
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 2018
Docket525423
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 2860 (Matter of Walker v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Walker v. Annucci, 2018 NY Slip Op 2860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Walker v Annucci (2018 NY Slip Op 02860)
Matter of Walker v Annucci
2018 NY Slip Op 02860
Decided on April 26, 2018
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 26, 2018

525423

[*1]In the Matter of CARLTON WALKER, Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date: March 2, 2018
Before: Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Devine and Pritzker, JJ.

Carlton Walker, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot

(see Matter of Morgan v Venettozzi, 156 AD3d 1107, 1107 [2017]; Matter of Ortega v Lee, 156 AD3d 1084, 1085 [2017]). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $15, and he has requested a refund thereof, we grant such request for reimbursement of that amount.

Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ortega v. Lee
2017 NY Slip Op 8770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Morgan v. Venettozzi
156 A.D.3d 1107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 2860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-walker-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2018.