Matter of VSA Architectural Consultants, P.C. v. State of New York Div. of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of VSA Architectural Consultants, P.C. v. State of New York Div. of Human Rights

138 A.D.3d 499, 28 N.Y.S.3d 304

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 2016

Docket796 100146/15

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.3d 499 (Matter of VSA Architectural Consultants, P.C. v. State of New York Div. of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of VSA Architectural Consultants, P.C. v. State of New York Div. of Human Rights, 138 A.D.3d 499, 28 N.Y.S.3d 304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered July 15, 2015, which denied the petition seeking to, among other things, annul a determination of respondent State of New York Division of Human Rights (DHR), dated October 24, 2014, denying petitioner’s application to vacate DHR’s determination that probable cause existed to believe that petitioner had engaged in disability discrimination against respondent Isabel Payano in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 290 et seq.), and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This proceeding is barred, because petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies (id.; Matter of Ken Edrich Leather Accessories v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 269 AD2d 334 [1st Dept 2000]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered July 15, 2015, which denied the petition seeking to, among other things, annul a determination of respondent State of New York Division of Human Rights (DHR), dated October 24, 2014, denying petitioner’s application to vacate DHR’s determination that probable cause existed to believe that petitioner had engaged in disability discrimination against respondent Isabel Payano in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 290 et seq.), and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This proceeding is barred, because petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies (id.; Matter of Ken Edrich Leather Accessories v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 269 AD2d 334 [1st Dept 2000]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Kahn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.3d 499, 28 N.Y.S.3d 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-vsa-architectural-consultants-pc-v-state-of-new-york-div-of-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack