Matter of Vito v. Dugan
Opinion
| Matter of Vito v Dugan |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 00722 |
| Decided on February 11, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 11, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, NOWAK, AND HANNAH, JJ.
922 CAF 24-01504
v
KYLE A. DUGAN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
HAYDEN M. DADD, CONFLICT DEFENDANT, GENESEO (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM D. BRODERICK, JR., ELMA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Livingston County (Kevin Van Allen, J.), dated September 6, 2024, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order, among other things, directed respondent to stay away from petitioner.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Vito v Dugan ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Feb. 11, 2026] [4th Dept 2026]).
Entered: February 11, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2026 NY Slip Op 00722 (Matter of Vito v. Dugan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.