Matter of Victor M.N. v. Norma G.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Victor M.N. v. Norma G.C.

2017 NY Slip Op 7331, 154 A.D.3d 554, 61 N.Y.S.3d 900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 2017

Docket4751

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 7331 (Matter of Victor M.N. v. Norma G.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Victor M.N. v. Norma G.C., 2017 NY Slip Op 7331, 154 A.D.3d 554, 61 N.Y.S.3d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Annette Louise Guarino, Ref.), entered on or about August 30, 2016, which modified a visitation order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, and assigned counsel’s motion to withdraw granted.

We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no viable arguments to be raised on appeal (Matter of Weems v Administration for Children’s Servs., 73 AD3d 617 [1st Dept 2010]). The parties’ child has turned 18 and thus is no longer subject to Family Court’s visitation order (see Family Ct Act § 651 [b]; Matter of Lozada v Pinto, 7 AD3d 801 [2d Dept 2004]).

Concur — Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Kahn and Kern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Annette Louise Guarino, Ref.), entered on or about August 30, 2016, which modified a visitation order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, and assigned counsel’s motion to withdraw granted.

We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no viable arguments to be raised on appeal (Matter of Weems v Administration for Children’s Servs., 73 AD3d 617 [1st Dept 2010]). The parties’ child has turned 18 and thus is no longer subject to Family Court’s visitation order (see Family Ct Act § 651 [b]; Matter of Lozada v Pinto, 7 AD3d 801 [2d Dept 2004]).

Concur — Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Kahn and Kern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 7331, 154 A.D.3d 554, 61 N.Y.S.3d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-victor-mn-v-norma-gc-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack