Matter of Vamos

83 F.2d 1022
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1936
Docket377
StatusPublished

This text of 83 F.2d 1022 (Matter of Vamos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Vamos, 83 F.2d 1022 (2d Cir. 1936).

Opinion

83 F.2d 1022 (1936)

In the Matter of Frank VAMOS, Bankrupt-Appellee.
David J. BONDY, Objecting Creditor-Appellant.

No. 377.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 18, 1936.

David I. Podell, of New York City (Jacob J. Podell and Morris Gottlieb, both of New York City, of counsel), for creditor-appellant.

Louis H. Robinson, of New York City (Albert M. Lee and J. George Levy, both of New York City, of counsel), for bankrupt-appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order (14 F.Supp. 700) affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Vamos
14 F. Supp. 700 (S.D. New York, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 F.2d 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-vamos-ca2-1936.