Matter of Umoja v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Umoja v. Green

120 A.D.3d 1351, 992 N.Y.S.2d 357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 17, 2014

Docket2014-06372

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1351 (Matter of Umoja v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Umoja v. Green, 120 A.D.3d 1351, 992 N.Y.S.2d 357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Desmond Green, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, to determine a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 in the criminal action entitled People v Umoja, commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 107/05, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted *1352 to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been rendered academic in light of the determination of the subject motion in an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 2014.

Dillon, J.P, Dickerson, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Desmond Green, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, to determine a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 in the criminal action entitled People v Umoja, commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 107/05, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted *1352 to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been rendered academic in light of the determination of the subject motion in an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 2014.

Dillon, J.P, Dickerson, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.3d 1351, 992 N.Y.S.2d 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-umoja-v-green-nyappdiv-2014.