Matter of Udell

154 P. 23, 171 Cal. 599, 1915 Cal. LEXIS 668
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1915
DocketCrim. No. 1993.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 154 P. 23 (Matter of Udell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Udell, 154 P. 23, 171 Cal. 599, 1915 Cal. LEXIS 668 (Cal. 1915).

Opinion

ANGELLOTTI, C. J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus by one Alva Udell, who is now in the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco under a judgment of the superior court thereof adjudging him guilty of contempt of court. The application is addressed to the chief justice and not to the court. The petition is defective in that it does not state whether any prior application has been made to any court for a writ in regard to the same detention or restraint, and if there was any such application, does not show the proceedings therein. (Pen. Code, sec. 1475.) As a matter of fact, a prior application in re *600 gard to the same detention or restraint was made by petitioner to this court, as our records show, on December 1, 1915, and such application was denied by the court on December 2, 1915. Not only was such application in regard to the same detention or restraint, but the grounds of the former application were the same as those now urged, with a greater degree of elaboration. While it may be that under certain circumstances the court itself might feel warranted in entertaining a second application from a party regarding the same detention or restraint, it is manifest that no single member of the court, be he chief justice or associate justice, is warranted in granting a writ where the same has been denied as to the same detention or restraint by the whole court in Bank.

The application to me for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Clark
855 P.2d 729 (California Supreme Court, 1993)
Wong Sun v. United States
293 F. 273 (Sixth Circuit, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 P. 23, 171 Cal. 599, 1915 Cal. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-udell-cal-1915.