Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen
69 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 628, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1206
Opinion
Memorandum: Some of the judges are of opinion that the appellant Ambro validly complied with section 335 of the Election Law but that view does not have the support of a majority of the court. Since the Appellate Division’s order of modification was made on the law alone, we lack the power to review the facts (Civ. Prac. Act, § 602). Hence, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion.
Concur: Lotjghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Ftjld, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher and Dye, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen, 69 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 628, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1206 (N.Y. 1946).
69 N.E.2d 15 (Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MATTER OF GOODMAN v. Hayduk
381 N.E.2d 165 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Casey v. Lomenzo
58 Misc. 2d 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Ambro v. Coveney
28 A.D.2d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)