Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen

69 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 628, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1206
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 17, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 69 N.E.2d 15 (Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen, 69 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 628, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1206 (N.Y. 1946).

Opinion

Memorandum: Some of the judges are of opinion that the appellant Ambro validly complied with section 335 of the Election Law but that view does not have the support of a majority of the court. Since the Appellate Division’s order of modification was made on the law alone, we lack the power to review the facts (Civ. Prac. Act, § 602). Hence, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur: Lotjghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Ftjld, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher and Dye, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF GOODMAN v. Hayduk
381 N.E.2d 165 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Casey v. Lomenzo
58 Misc. 2d 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Ambro v. Coveney
28 A.D.2d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 628, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tuomey-v-cohen-ny-1946.