Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen
This text of 69 N.E.2d 15 (Matter of Tuomey v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: Some of the judges are of opinion that the appellant Ambro validly complied with section 335 of the Election Law but that view does not have the support of a majority of the court. Since the Appellate Division’s order of modification was made on the law alone, we lack the power to review the facts (Civ. Prac. Act, § 602). Hence, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion.
Concur: Lotjghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Ftjld, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher and Dye, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 N.E.2d 15, 296 N.Y. 628, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tuomey-v-cohen-ny-1946.