Matter of Tucker

126 N.E. 923, 228 N.Y. 505, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 955
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 1920·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews-, JJ. Absent: His cock, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Tucker, 126 N.E. 923, 228 N.Y. 505, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 955 (N.Y. 1920).

126 N.E. 923 (Matter of Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Tate v. Estate of Dickens
276 A.D.2d 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Liston v. Hicks
243 A.D. 159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Buckley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
66 F.2d 394 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Flynn v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 1329 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1931)
In re Department of Public Works
223 A.D. 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)