Matter of Tubilewicz v. Styles

2018 NY Slip Op 4207
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 2018
Docket693 CAF 17-01419
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 4207 (Matter of Tubilewicz v. Styles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Tubilewicz v. Styles, 2018 NY Slip Op 4207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Tubilewicz v Styles (2018 NY Slip Op 04207)
Matter of Tubilewicz v Styles
2018 NY Slip Op 04207
Decided on June 8, 2018
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 8, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

693 CAF 17-01419

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA TUBILEWICZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

DAVID STYLES, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


KOSLOSKY & KOSLOSKY, UTICA (WILLIAM L. KOSLOSKY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Joan E. Shkane, J.), entered July 24, 2017 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order, inter alia, committed respondent to the Oneida County Jail for two consecutive six-month jail terms for violations of a court order.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order in which Family Court, inter alia, found that respondent violated a temporary order of protection, respondent's sole contention is that the court exceeded its authority in imposing two consecutive six-month jail terms based on the violations. The appeal from the order "is academic . . . [because respondent] has served the period of incarceration, and there is no ameliorative action for this Court to take" (Matter of Trentacoste v Trentacoste , 211 AD2d 724, 726 [2d Dept 1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 707 [1995]; see Matter of Geritano v Geritano , 212 AD2d 788, 788 [2d Dept 1995]).

Entered: June 8, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trentacoste v. Trentacoste
211 A.D.2d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Geritano v. Geritano
212 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 4207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tubilewicz-v-styles-nyappdiv-2018.