MATTER OF TPK CONSTR. CORP. v. O'Shea
This text of 407 N.E.2d 1331 (MATTER OF TPK CONSTR. CORP. v. O'Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. From our review of the record, we cannot say that the commissioner was compelled to find that the appellant’s low estimate was a result of a failure to consider the need for waterproofing as opposed to a mere lack of skill in projecting *837 costs. In any event, especially in view of the conspicuous absence of direct documentary proof of how the bid was prepared, we conclude that the commissioner’s refusal to allow it to be withdrawn was neither arbitrary nor capricious nor affected by an error of law (see Matter of Fisher [Levine], 36 NY2d 146, 150).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 N.E.2d 1331, 50 N.Y.2d 835, 430 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tpk-constr-corp-v-oshea-ny-1980.