Matter of Town of Ogden v. Wolf

178 N.Y.S.3d 738, 2022 NY Slip Op 07333
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2022
Docket773 CA 21-01619
StatusPublished

This text of 178 N.Y.S.3d 738 (Matter of Town of Ogden v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Town of Ogden v. Wolf, 178 N.Y.S.3d 738, 2022 NY Slip Op 07333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Matter of Town of Ogden v Wolf (2022 NY Slip Op 07333)
Matter of Town of Ogden v Wolf
2022 NY Slip Op 07333
Decided on December 23, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., NEMOYER, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

773 CA 21-01619

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF TOWN OF OGDEN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

JEREMY WOLF, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


PENBERTHY LAW GROUP LLP, BUFFALO (BRITTANY PENBERTHY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

KEITH O'TOOLE, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Michael L. Dollinger, J.), entered April 24, 2021. The order, inter alia, affirmed that part of an order of the Ogden Town Court determining that respondent's dog was a dangerous dog under Agriculture and Markets Law § 123.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of County Court that, inter alia, affirmed Town Court's determination that the dog was a dangerous dog under Agriculture and Markets Law § 123 and that the victim had sustained serious physical injury when the dog attacked her without justification. We dismiss the appeal as moot because the issues in this case no longer present a live controversy inasmuch as "the dog died during the pendency of this appeal" (Board of Mgrs. of the Cove Club Condominium v Jacobson, 107 AD3d 414, 414 [1st Dept 2013]). We further conclude that the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

Entered: December 23, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 N.Y.S.3d 738, 2022 NY Slip Op 07333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-town-of-ogden-v-wolf-nyappdiv-2022.