Matter of Tormey v. Laguardia
18 N.E.2d 864, 279 N.Y. 780, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 941
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied. Upon the record before us we decided that petitioners were entitled to receive, during the period from July 1, 1937, to August 15, 1937, that being the period embraced within the claims filed with the comptroller, at least the per diem salary received at or immediately preceding the date on which their names were placed on the preferred list. The record did not disclose that they were working on an hourly basis. (See 278 N. Y. 450.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Tormey v. Laguardia, 18 N.E.2d 864, 279 N.Y. 780, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 941 (N.Y. 1939).
18 N.E.2d 864 (Matter of Tormey v. Laguardia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
62 N.E.2d 609 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
268 A.D. 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Horowitz
256 A.D. 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)