Matter of Tormey v. Laguardia

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Tormey v. Laguardia

18 N.E.2d 864, 279 N.Y. 780, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 941

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 5, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 18 N.E.2d 864 (Matter of Tormey v. Laguardia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Tormey v. Laguardia, 18 N.E.2d 864, 279 N.Y. 780, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 941 (N.Y. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur denied. Upon the record before us we decided that petitioners were entitled to receive, during the period from July 1, 1937, to August 15, 1937, that being the period embraced within the claims filed with the comptroller, at least the per diem salary received at or immediately preceding the date on which their names were placed on the preferred list. The record did not disclose that they were working on an hourly basis. (See 278 N. Y. 450.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur denied. Upon the record before us we decided that petitioners were entitled to receive, during the period from July 1, 1937, to August 15, 1937, that being the period embraced within the claims filed with the comptroller, at least the per diem salary received at or immediately preceding the date on which their names were placed on the preferred list. The record did not disclose that they were working on an hourly basis. (See 278 N. Y. 450.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.E.2d 864, 279 N.Y. 780, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tormey-v-laguardia-ny-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack