MATTER OF TON-DA-LAY, LTD. v. Diamond

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF TON-DA-LAY, LTD. v. Diamond

331 N.E.2d 695, 36 N.Y.2d 856

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 331 N.E.2d 695 (MATTER OF TON-DA-LAY, LTD. v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF TON-DA-LAY, LTD. v. Diamond, 331 N.E.2d 695, 36 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

36 N.Y.2d 856 (1975)

In the Matter of Ton-Da-Lay, Ltd., Respondent, and Franklin County et al., Intervenors-Respondents,
v.
Henry L. Diamond, as Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, et al., Appellants, and Sierra Club, Intervenor-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted March 10, 1975. Decided May 8, 1975.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Ruth Kessler Toch, Stanley Fishman and Julius Feinstein of counsel), and Robert J. Kafin for motions.

Charles S. Desmond and David N. Ellenhorn opposed.

Motions dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. The decision of the commissioner having been confirmed at the Appellate Division, movants cannot be said to be aggrieved parties (CPLR 5511) in consequence of views expressed in the opinion in that court which movants may argue in an appropriate case were not essential to its disposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

36 N.Y.2d 856 (1975)

In the Matter of Ton-Da-Lay, Ltd., Respondent, and Franklin County et al., Intervenors-Respondents,
v.
Henry L. Diamond, as Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, et al., Appellants, and Sierra Club, Intervenor-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted March 10, 1975. Decided May 8, 1975.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Ruth Kessler Toch, Stanley Fishman and Julius Feinstein of counsel), and Robert J. Kafin for motions.

Charles S. Desmond and David N. Ellenhorn opposed.

Motions dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. The decision of the commissioner having been confirmed at the Appellate Division, movants cannot be said to be aggrieved parties (CPLR 5511) in consequence of views expressed in the opinion in that court which movants may argue in an appropriate case were not essential to its disposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 N.E.2d 695, 36 N.Y.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ton-da-lay-ltd-v-diamond-ny-1975.

Opinion

In the Matter of Ton-Da-Lay, Ltd., Respondent, and Franklin County et al., Intervenors-Respondents, v. Henry L. Diamond, as Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, et al., Appellants, and Sierra Club, Intervenor-Appellant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of Ton-Da-Lay, Ltd., Respondent, and Franklin County et al., Intervenors-Respondents,
v.
Henry L. Diamond, as Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, et al., Appellants, and Sierra Club, Intervenor-Appellant.