Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner
164 N.E. 564, 249 N.Y. 510, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 N.Y. 594 →
Opinion
The order was affirmed upon the ground that there was no clear legal duty on the part of the Borough President to remove bungalows from streets which had not yet been regulated and opened to the public.
The motion for reargument should be denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner, 164 N.E. 564, 249 N.Y. 510, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 835 (N.Y. 1928).
164 N.E. 564 (Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.