Matter of Tinghino

43 A.3d 1160, 210 N.J. 250, 2012 WL 2025594, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 598
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 5, 2012·No. D-106 September Term 2011, 070580·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-384, concluding that LAWRENCE M. TINGHINO of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), and RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LAWRENCE M. TINGHINO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*251 ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Tinghino, 43 A.3d 1160, 210 N.J. 250, 2012 WL 2025594, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 598 (N.J. 2012).

43 A.3d 1160 (Matter of Tinghino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.