MATTER OF THORGEIRSDOTTIR v. New York City Loft Bd.
573 N.E.2d 574, 77 N.Y.2d 951, 570 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 622
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (161 AD2d 337).
Concur: Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye and Alexander dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Israel Rubin at the Appellate Division (161 AD2d 337, 340).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF THORGEIRSDOTTIR v. New York City Loft Bd., 573 N.E.2d 574, 77 N.Y.2d 951, 570 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 622 (N.Y. 1991).
573 N.E.2d 574 (MATTER OF THORGEIRSDOTTIR v. New York City Loft Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BR 31, LLC v. Landess
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Bronner v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
3 A.D.3d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Emunim v. Town of Fallsburg
577 N.E.2d 34 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Henschke v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
174 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)