Matter of Theresa M. v. Antoine A.

2017 NY Slip Op 6892, 154 A.D.3d 414, 60 N.Y.S.3d 815, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 3, 2017
Docket4556
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6892 (Matter of Theresa M. v. Antoine A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Theresa M. v. Antoine A., 2017 NY Slip Op 6892, 154 A.D.3d 414, 60 N.Y.S.3d 815, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order of protection, Family Court, Bronx County (Tracey A. Bing, J.), entered on or about April 8, 2016, bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about April 5, 2016, which found that the respondent father had violated an earlier order of protection by committing the family offenses of harassment in the second degree and disorderly conduct, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings that the father committed the family offenses of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]) and disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20) were supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence, including the mother’s testimony that, inter alia, the father grabbed the mother in the lobby of her apartment building and cursed at *415 her with the intent to alarm her through physical contact, and that his conduct had alarmed and annoyed the public. The father, too, admitted the truth of some of the mother’s allegations regarding the incident, including that he had cursed and yelled at the mother and that the child was frightened. The fact that the father denied some of the mother’s allegations simply created an issue of credibility, which was properly resolved by the court (Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P. 61 AD3d 489, 489 [1st Dept 2009]). As the court’s findings had a sound and substantial basis in the record, there is no reason to disturb them on appeal (id.).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everett C. v. Oneida P.
61 A.D.3d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 6892, 154 A.D.3d 414, 60 N.Y.S.3d 815, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-theresa-m-v-antoine-a-nyappdiv-2017.