Matter of Teixeira v. Spota

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Teixeira v. Spota

130 A.D.3d 637, 11 N.Y.S.3d 488

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 2015·No. 2015-02612·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, in effect, to prohibit the respondents from enforcing an order issued by the respondent William J. Condon, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 23, 2014, denying the application of the petitioner, a defendant in a criminal action entitled People v Teixeira, pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under indictment No. 724/14, to participate in a judicial diversion program (see CPL 216.00).

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner seeks, in effect, to prohibit enforcement of an *638 order dated October 23, 2014. This proceeding was not commenced until March 31, 2015. Accordingly, it must be dismissed as time-barred (see CPLR 217; Matter of Holtzman v Marrus, 74 NY2d 865 [1989]; Matter of Levy v Reitz, 118 AD3d 702 [2014]). Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, in effect, to prohibit the respondents from enforcing an order issued by the respondent William J. Condon, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 23, 2014, denying the application of the petitioner, a defendant in a criminal action entitled People v Teixeira, pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under indictment No. 724/14, to participate in a judicial diversion program (see CPL 216.00).

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner seeks, in effect, to prohibit enforcement of an *638 order dated October 23, 2014. This proceeding was not commenced until March 31, 2015. Accordingly, it must be dismissed as time-barred (see CPLR 217; Matter of Holtzman v Marrus, 74 NY2d 865 [1989]; Matter of Levy v Reitz, 118 AD3d 702 [2014]). Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Matter of Teixeira v. Spota, 130 A.D.3d 637, 11 N.Y.S.3d 488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

130 A.D.3d 637 (Matter of Teixeira v. Spota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related