Matter of Tartir

2019 NY Slip Op 3348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 2019
Docket2008-08255 ON MOTION
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3348 (Matter of Tartir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Tartir, 2019 NY Slip Op 3348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Tartir (2019 NY Slip Op 03348)
Matter of Tartir
2019 NY Slip Op 03348
Decided on May 1, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 1, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON
RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.

2008-08255 ON MOTION

[*1]In the Matter of Ihab Hussam Tartir, a suspended attorney.


(Attorney Registration No. 2981322)



DECISION & ORDER

Motion by Ihab Hussam Tartir for reinstatement to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Mr. Tartir was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department on June 22, 1999. By decision and order on motion dated February 6, 2009, this Court immediately suspended Mr. Tartir, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(f), based on his conviction of a serious crime. By opinion and order of this Court dated February 7, 2012, Mr. Tartir was suspended from the practice of law for a period five years, effective immediately (see Matter of Tartir, 93 AD3d 82). By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 4, 2018, Mr. Tartir's motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on his character and fitness to practice law.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that, effective immediately, Ihab Hussam Tartir is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Ihab Hussam Tartir to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Tartir
93 A.D.3d 82 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tartir-nyappdiv-2019.