Matter of Syracuse Cmty. Health Ctr. v. Wendi Am
659 N.E.2d 760, 86 N.Y.2d 856, 635 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5642
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, with costs to petitioner-respondent Syracuse Community Health Center as against respondent-appellant New York State Division of Human Rights (see, Matter of North Shore Univ. Hosp. v Rosa, 86 NY2d 413 [decided today]).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Syracuse Cmty. Health Ctr. v. Wendi Am, 659 N.E.2d 760, 86 N.Y.2d 856, 635 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5642 (N.Y. 1995).
659 N.E.2d 760 (Matter of Syracuse Cmty. Health Ctr. v. Wendi Am) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North Shore University Hospital v. Rosa
657 N.E.2d 483 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)