Matter of Sykes v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Sykes v. City of New York

139 A.D.3d 468, 29 N.Y.S.3d 797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 2016

Docket159428/14 1107 1106

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 468 (Matter of Sykes v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Sykes v. City of New York, 139 A.D.3d 468, 29 N.Y.S.3d 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. Ñervo, J.), entered March 17, 2015, denying the petition for leave to amend the notice of claim, and dismissing the proceeding unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the petition granted. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 7, 2015, which denied petitioner’s motion for leave to “reargue,” unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The notice of claim gave respondents notice of the incident giving rise to the claim and identified witnesses as well as the location.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. Ñervo, J.), entered March 17, 2015, denying the petition for leave to amend the notice of claim, and dismissing the proceeding unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the petition granted. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 7, 2015, which denied petitioner’s motion for leave to “reargue,” unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The notice of claim gave respondents notice of the incident giving rise to the claim and identified witnesses as well as the location.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.3d 468, 29 N.Y.S.3d 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sykes-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2016.