Matter of Susquehanna Silk Mills v. Fair Waist Dress
157 N.E. 847, 245 N.Y. 535, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 690
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on ground that the third condition of the contract permits cancellation of deliveries in accordance with the terms of credit and does not permit the cancellation or modification of other obligations of the contract.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Susquehanna Silk Mills v. Fair Waist Dress, 157 N.E. 847, 245 N.Y. 535, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 690 (N.Y. 1927).
157 N.E. 847 (Matter of Susquehanna Silk Mills v. Fair Waist Dress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People Ex Rel. Rosenberg v. Keating
144 P.2d 992 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1944)