Matter of Sukherman
This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03843 (Matter of Sukherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Sukherman |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 03843 |
| Decided on June 16, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Per Curiam. |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 16, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
REINALDO E. RIVERA
MARK C. DILLON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2021-01095
APPLICATION pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.10 by Leonard B. Sukherman, who was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 9, 2002, to resign as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
Diana Maxfield Kearse, Brooklyn, NY, for petitioner.
Michael S. Ross, New York, NY, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
OPINION & ORDER
The respondent, Leonard B. Sukherman, has submitted an affidavit sworn to on February 5, 2021, in support of his application to resign as an attorney and counselor-at-law (see 22 NYCRR 1240.10). The respondent acknowledges that he is currently the subject of two investigations by the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, involving at least the following acts of professional misconduct: neglect, failure to communicate with a client, failure to refund an unearned fee, failure to maintain adequate records for his escrow account, commingling personal funds with client funds, and misappropriating funds he was holding as a fiduciary on behalf of two clients, in the amounts of $2,762 and $1,148.67, respectively. The respondent avers that he cannot successfully defend himself against the charges and allegations based upon the facts and circumstances of his professional conduct.
The respondent also acknowledges that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress by anyone, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation, including that the Court's acceptance and approval shall result in the entry of an order of disbarment striking his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.
As to the issue of restitution, the respondent has provided proof that on May 9, 2012, he reimbursed the $2,762 and $1,148.67 due to the two clients. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the respondent acknowledges that his resignation is submitted subject to any future application that may be made by the Grievance Committee for an order, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(6-a), directing that he make restitution or reimburse the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, and that he consents to the Court's continuing jurisdiction to make such an order.
The respondent also acknowledges and agrees that pending the issuance of this order accepting his resignation, he will not undertake to represent any new clients or accept any retainers for future legal services to be rendered, and that there will be no transactional activity in any fiduciary account to which he has access, other than for payment of funds held therein on behalf of clients or others entitled to receive them.
Lastly, the respondent acknowledges that in the event the Court accepts his [*2]resignation, the order resulting therefrom and the records and documents filed in relation to the aforementioned charges and allegations, including his affidavit, shall be deemed public records pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(10).
The Grievance Committee recommends that the Court grant the respondent's application to resign.
Inasmuch as the respondent's application to resign complies with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 1240.10, the application is granted and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.
LASALLE, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the application of the respondent, Leonard B. Sukherman, to resign as an attorney and counselor-at-law is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Leonard B. Sukherman, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent, Leonard B. Sukherman, shall comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Leonard B. Sukherman, shall desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that if the respondent, Leonard B. Sukherman, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and he shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f).
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 NY Slip Op 03843, 196 A.D.3d 92, 145 N.Y.S.3d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sukherman-nyappdiv-2021.