Matter of Strauss v. Freiheit
320 N.E.2d 867, 35 N.Y.2d 780
This text of 320 N.E.2d 867 (Matter of Strauss v. Freiheit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Matter of Strauss v. Freiheit, 320 N.E.2d 867, 35 N.Y.2d 780 (N.Y. 1974).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Sylvia Strauss, Appellant,
v.
Morning Freiheit et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Herbert Rubin and David Hoffman for appellant.
John M. Cullen and Herbert Lasky for State Insurance Fund, respondent.
No appearance for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Burriesci v. Gristede Bros.
72 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
320 N.E.2d 867, 35 N.Y.2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-strauss-v-freiheit-ny-1974.