Matter of Stoulig

45 F.3d 957, 1995 WL 54700
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1995
Docket94-30411
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 45 F.3d 957 (Matter of Stoulig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Stoulig, 45 F.3d 957, 1995 WL 54700 (5th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case the debtors filed under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on December 3, 1993, claiming certain of their properties to be exempt from distribution to creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 522(i). An interim trustee was appointed December 9, 1993. On January 13, 1994, the meeting of creditors under section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code was held, and at the meeting the debtors furnished the trustee with all requested information concerning the debtors’ claimed exemptions. Two days before the expiration of the thirty-day period provided for in Bankruptcy Rule 4003(b), the trustee moved for an extension of the deadline for filing objections to the claimed exemptions. On April 8, 1994, the bankruptcy court granted the trustee’s motion to extend the deadline for filing objections to exemptions. The debtors appealed, and the district court reversed, holding that under rule 4003(b) the bankruptcy court was without jurisdiction to grant an extension of time to file objections to exemptions after the expiration of the thirty-day period prescribed by rule 4003(b). Lawrence W. Stoulig, Jr., et al. v. Cynthia Lee Traina, 169 B.R. 597 (E.D.La.1994). The trustee brings this appeal. We affirm, essentially for the reasons *958 stated in the district court’s careful and well considered opinion.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Steffen
391 B.R. 874 (M.D. Florida, 2008)
In re Bush
346 B.R. 523 (E.D. Washington, 2006)
In Re Comeaux
305 B.R. 802 (E.D. Texas, 2003)
In Re Harrington
306 B.R. 172 (E.D. Texas, 2003)
Perry v. Dearing (In Re Perry)
345 F.3d 303 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Perry v. Dearing (In Re Perry)
289 B.R. 860 (W.D. Texas, 2002)
Block v. Moss (In Re Moss)
258 B.R. 391 (W.D. Missouri, 2001)
Lawrence v. Goldberg (In Re Lawrence)
244 B.R. 868 (S.D. Florida, 2000)
In Re McCormack
244 B.R. 203 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
In Re Alexander
236 B.R. 679 (D. Minnesota, 1999)
Hovis v. Wiggins (In Re Wiggins)
220 B.R. 262 (D. South Carolina, 1998)
Barbee v. Statner (In Re Statner)
212 B.R. 164 (S.D. Florida, 1997)
Gebhardt v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)
203 B.R. 64 (E.D. Texas, 1996)
Dombroff v. Greene (In Re Dombroff)
192 B.R. 615 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Canino v. Bleau (In Re Canino)
185 B.R. 584 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 957, 1995 WL 54700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-stoulig-ca5-1995.