Matter of Stickle v. Westcott Garage

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Stickle v. Westcott Garage

45 N.E.2d 904, 289 N.Y. 343, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 956

DecidedDecember 3, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 45 N.E.2d 904 (Matter of Stickle v. Westcott Garage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Stickle v. Westcott Garage, 45 N.E.2d 904, 289 N.Y. 343, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 956 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At any time before final payment to a claimant of a settlement agreed upon following a factual controversy between the carrier and claimant, the department may make such decision or order in the premises as in its judgment is just and proper including one disapproving payment of the unpaid balance of the settlement. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 123 [Cons. Laws, ch. 67]; Matter of Whitmyre v. International Business Machine Corp., 274 N. Y. 61.)

Matter of Miller (227 App. Div. 675, affd., 253 N. Y. 541) is not in conflict. There a widow obtained an award for the death of her husband and thereafter died. Her administratrix sought payment to her estate of the amount of the award unpaid at the time of her death. Clearly the right of the widow to the award had vested in her and no limitation of Workmen’s Compensation Law, section 123, was intended or effected by the decision.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the decision of the State Industrial Board affirmed without costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Lotjghran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI