Matter of Steadman v. Douglas

179 N.Y.S.3d 626, 212 A.D.3d 638, 2023 NY Slip Op 00098
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 11, 2023
Docket2022-08321
StatusPublished

This text of 179 N.Y.S.3d 626 (Matter of Steadman v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Steadman v. Douglas, 179 N.Y.S.3d 626, 212 A.D.3d 638, 2023 NY Slip Op 00098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Matter of Steadman v Douglas (2023 NY Slip Op 00098)
Matter of Steadman v Douglas
2023 NY Slip Op 00098
Decided on January 11, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 11, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2022-08321 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Harry Steadman, petitioner,

v

Dena Douglas, etc., et al., respondents. Harry Steadman, Attica, NY, petitioner pro se.


Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (James B. Cooney of counsel), for respondent Dena Douglas.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Dena Douglas, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine a motion in an action entitled People v Steadman , pending in that court under Indictment No. 787/16, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

On December 5, 2022, the respondent Dena Douglas issued an order determining the subject motion. Accordingly, this proceeding has been rendered academic.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

BARROS, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 8022
New York CVP § 8022(b)
§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 N.Y.S.3d 626, 212 A.D.3d 638, 2023 NY Slip Op 00098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-steadman-v-douglas-nyappdiv-2023.