Matter of Steadman v. Douglas
Opinion
| Matter of Steadman v Douglas |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 00098 |
| Decided on January 11, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on January 11, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
2022-08321 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT
v
Dena Douglas, etc., et al., respondents. Harry Steadman, Attica, NY, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (James B. Cooney of counsel), for respondent Dena Douglas.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Dena Douglas, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine a motion in an action entitled People v Steadman , pending in that court under Indictment No. 787/16, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
On December 5, 2022, the respondent Dena Douglas issued an order determining the subject motion. Accordingly, this proceeding has been rendered academic.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
BARROS, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
179 N.Y.S.3d 626 (Matter of Steadman v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.