Matter of State Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

418 N.E.2d 663, 52 N.Y.2d 840
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 8, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 418 N.E.2d 663 (Matter of State Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of State Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 418 N.E.2d 663, 52 N.Y.2d 840 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

52 N.Y.2d 840 (1981)

In the Matter of the Arbitration between State Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, and Wilfredo Mercado et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted December 15, 1980.
Decided January 8, 1981.

John V. Henry and Joseph C. Petillo for appellant.

Frederick Feder for respondents.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

*841MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs, by providing that the arbitration proceed under the terms of the arbitration clause in the insurance policy, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Generally, arbitration is to proceed according to the provisions in the contract (see Matter of Siegel [Lewis], 40 N.Y.2d 687; Matter of Astoria Med. Group [Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y.], 11 N.Y.2d 128; Matter of Lipschutz [Gutwirth], 304 N.Y. 58). Under the contract here, one arbitrator is chosen by each party and these two then choose a third. The contract provides further only that arbitration is subject to "[l]ocal rules of law as to procedure and evidence." However convenient the procedures of the American Arbitration Association may be, New York law does not mandate and the out-of-State policy does not authorize the court to direct proceedings before that body.

Order modified, with costs to appellant, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Great American Insurance v. Garcia
250 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Cinisomo
197 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jones
188 A.D.2d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 N.E.2d 663, 52 N.Y.2d 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-state-mut-auto-ins-co-ny-1981.