Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Watson

128 A.D.3d 841, 7 N.Y.S.3d 910
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 2015
Docket2014-07129
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 A.D.3d 841 (Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Watson, 128 A.D.3d 841, 7 N.Y.S.3d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Ivette M. Joseph, Lincoln H. Joseph, and Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Ins. Co. appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Bangs County (Schack, J.), dated April 19, 2014, which, upon adopting the findings of a Judicial Hearing Officer (Archer, J.H.O.) dated February 27, 2014, made after a framed-issue hearing, that a vehicle owned by Ivette M. Joseph and Lincoln H. Joseph was involved in the subject accident, in effect, granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Where, as here, a matter is determined after a hearing, this *842 Court’s power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the hearing court, taking into account in a close case the fact that the hearing court had the advantage of seeing the witnesses (see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; Matter of Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co. v Scott, 123 AD3d 932, 933 [2014]; Matter of Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v Lubeck, 111 AD3d 947, 948 [2013]). We decline to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination, adopting the findings of a Judicial Hearing Officer, after a framed-issue hearing, that a vehicle owned by Ivette M. Joseph and Lincoln H. Joseph was involved in the subject accident.

The parties’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration. Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez
2021 NY Slip Op 03593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 A.D.3d 841, 7 N.Y.S.3d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-co-v-watson-nyappdiv-2015.