Matter of Standards for Competency

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 29, 1999
Docket97-326
StatusPublished

This text of Matter of Standards for Competency (Matter of Standards for Competency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Standards for Competency, (Mo. 1999).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR COMPETENCY OF COUNSEL APPOINTED TO REPRESENT No. 97-326 INDIGENT PERSONS IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER TITLE 46, CHAPTER 2 1, WHO ARE SENTENCED TO DEATH

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR COMPETENCY OF TRIAL AND APPELLATE COUNSEL APPOINTED TO REPRESENT INDIGENT PERSONS IN CAPITAL CASES

ORDER

On December 30, 1998, this Court issued an Order granting the bench and bar of this State, and any other interested persons, 90 days to prepare and file with the Clerk of this Court written comments, suggestions, or criticisms of the Proposed Standards for Competency of Counsel for Indigent Persons in Death Penalty Cases. Said comment period having expired and this Court having deemed this matter submitted for final determination, we now adopt these standards. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the attached Standards for Competency of Counsel for Indigent Persons in Death Penalty Cases shall be effective for appointments of counsel from and after January 1,200O. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court provide copies of this Order, together with a copy of the attached standards, to each of the Clerks of the District Courts of the State of Montana, to each of the District Judges of the State of Montana, to each member of the Proposed Standards Committee and to the State Bar of Montana, with the request that a copy of this Order and the attached standards be published in the next possible issue of the Mofltnnn Lnwyer. Chief Justice / STANDARDS FOR COMPETENCY OF COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT PERSONS IN DEATH PENALTY CASES

I TRIAL PHASE 1. a. In any case in which death is a potential punishment, the prosecutor shall file with the district court, within 60 days after arraignment, a statement indicating whether the prosecutor believes that sufficient evidence exists to establish by the appropriate standard of proof one or more of the statutory aggravating factors necessary to impose the death penalty under Montana law, and whether the prosecutor intends to seek the death penalty upon a conviction in the case. b. The prosecutor shall not identify in the notice the aggravating factor or factors believed to be present onthe evidence on which the prosecutor will rely to prove an aggravating factor, but upon request by the defense the prosecutor shall identify to defense counsel the aggravating factor(s) the prosecutor believes are present and the evidence supporting the existence of the aggravating factor(s). C. The prosecutor may withdraw the notice provided in this standard at any time. d. If the prosecutor does not indicate a belief that the death penalty may be appropriate in a notice filed within 60 days after arraignment as providqd by this standard, but later acquires evidence that, together with any other evidence, leads the prosecutor to conclude that sufficient evidence exists to establish, to the appropriate standard of proof, one or more of the statutory aggravating factors necessary to impose the death penalty upon a conviction in the case, the prosecutor may file the notice provided in this section, only with leave of the district court, after consideration of the cause for the delay and any prejudice to the defendant.

1 2. Upon establishment of indigency as provided in Title 46, Chapter 8, Part i, Montana Code Annotated, and identification of a case as one in which the prosecutor believes sufficient evidence exists to show that one or more statutory aggravating factors under 5 46-18-303, MCA, can be proved to the appropriate standard of proof, the district court shall appoint two counsel to represent the defendant. 3. In selecting appointed counsel, the district court shall secure sufficient information from counsel to be appointed, either in writing or on the record, to satisfy the district court that counsel possess the following minimum qualifications: a. Both appointed attorneys must be members in good standing of the State Bar of Montana or admitted to practice before the district courtpvo hat vice. b. Both counsel must have completed or taught, in the two-year period prior to appointment or within 90 days after the appointment, a continuing legal education course or courses, approved for credit by the appropriate authority under the rules adopted by the Montana Supreme Court, at least 12 hours of which deal with subjects related to the defense of persons accused or convicted of capita1 crimes. c. Counsel, either individually or in combination, must have had significant experience within the past 5 years in the trial of criminal cases to conclusion, including a capita1 case or a case involving charges of or equivalent to deliberate homicide under Montana law. d. The nature and volume of the workload of both appointed counsel is such$hat they will have the ability to spend the time necessary to defend a capital case. e. Counsel are familiar with and have a copy of the current American Bar Association standards. for the defense of capital cases. By adoption of this provision, the Montana Supreme Court does not hold that adherence to the guidelines is required as a condition of providing effective assistance of counsel, or that failure to adhere to the guidelines gives rise to an inference of ineffective assistance of counsel.

II APPEAL PHASE 1 . If a defendant is sentenced to death and is determined by the district court to be indigent, the district court shall appoint two attorneys to represent the defendant on direct appeal. 2. In selecting appointed counsel for appeal, the district court shall secure sufficient information from counsel to be appointed, either in writing or on the record, to satisfy the district court that counsel possess sufficient appellate experience to provide adequate representation to the defendant on appeal and the following minimum qualifications: a. Both appointed attorneys, must be members in good standing of the State Bar of Montana or admitted to practice before the district courtpro hat vice. .1 b. Both counsel must have completed or taught, in the two-year period prior to appointment or within 90 days after the appointment, a continuing legal education course or courses, approved for credit by the appropriate authority under the rules adopted by the Montana Supreme Court, at least 12 hours of which deal with subjects related to the defense of persons accused or convicted of capital crimes. c. Counsel, either individually or in combination, must have had significant experience within the past 5 years in the appeal of criminal cases, including a capital case or a case involving charges of or equivalent to deliberate homicide under Montana law. d. The nature and volume of the workload of both appointed counsel is such that they will have the ability to spend the time necessary to appeal a capital case. e. Counsel are familiar with and have a copy of the current American Bar Association standards for the defense of capital cases. By adoption of this

3 provision, the Montana Supreme Court does not hold that adherence to the guidelines is required as a condition of providing effective assistance of counsel, or that failure to adhere to the guidelines gives rise to an inference of ineffective assistance of counsel.

III POSTCONVICTION PHASE The following standards shall apply to counsel appointed by the district court to represent indigent petitioners in postconviction proceedings under Title 46, Chapter 21, who are sentenced to death. 1. The district court shall follow the procedure set forth in 5 46-21-201, MCA, in appointing counsel in state postconviction cases. 2. The district court shall appoint two counsel. One of the appointed counsel may be an attorney who has been admitted pro hat vice. Lead counsel shall satisfy all of the following: a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Matter of Standards for Competency, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-standards-for-competency-mont-1999.