MATTER OF SORLI v. Coveney

410 N.E.2d 1228, 51 N.Y.2d 713, 431 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2580
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 28, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 410 N.E.2d 1228 (MATTER OF SORLI v. Coveney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF SORLI v. Coveney, 410 N.E.2d 1228, 51 N.Y.2d 713, 431 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2580 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding by an order to show cause. Although the order required that service be effected on or before August 7, 1980, service was not completed until the next day at the earliest. Inasmuch as petitioner failed to follow the provisions for service specified in the order to show cause, the petition must be dismissed (see Matter of Bruno v Ackerson, 39 NY2d 718).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keith X. v. Kristin Y.
124 A.D.3d 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
State v. Robert C.
113 A.D.3d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Sharma v. New
87 A.D.3d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
El Greco Society of Visual Arts, Inc. v. Diamantidis
47 A.D.3d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Frederick v. Goord
20 A.D.3d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Phillips v. Sanfilippo
306 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Owens v. New York State Department of Social Services
197 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Bogle v. Coughlin
165 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Zaretski v. Tutunjian
133 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 N.E.2d 1228, 51 N.Y.2d 713, 431 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sorli-v-coveney-ny-1980.