Matter of Smith v. . O.M. Osterheld Son
129 N.E. 901, 229 N.Y. 525, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 723
This text of 129 N.E. 901 (Matter of Smith v. . O.M. Osterheld Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Matter of Smith v. . O.M. Osterheld Son, 129 N.E. 901, 229 N.Y. 525, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 723 (N.Y. 1920).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Caedozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Claim of Vincent
223 A.D. 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Claim of Norris v. New York Central Railroad
158 N.E. 879 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
129 N.E. 901, 229 N.Y. 525, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-smith-v-om-osterheld-son-ny-1920.