Matter of Smith v. Briggs

37 N.E.2d 452, 286 N.Y. 714, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2280
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 22, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 N.E.2d 452 (Matter of Smith v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Smith v. Briggs, 37 N.E.2d 452, 286 N.Y. 714, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2280 (N.Y. 1941).

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Division reversed and order of the Special Term affirmed in so far as it declares Philip M. Smith to be the nominee for said office by said party. We *716 hold that ballots with exhibit numbers 13, 66 and 183 are blank as to the office of District Attorney. We hold that ballots with exhibit numbers 29, 32, 41, 100 and 122 are void. In other respects we agree with the findings of the Appellate Division. Accordingly we find that Philip M. Smith received 1,477 votes and Leslie E. Briggs 1,476 votes. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pavlic v. Haley
20 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Pavlic v. Haley
40 Misc. 2d 975 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 N.E.2d 452, 286 N.Y. 714, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-smith-v-briggs-ny-1941.