Matter of SLG 810 Seventh Lessee LLC v. Tydel Holding Corp.
This text of Matter of SLG 810 Seventh Lessee LLC v. Tydel Holding Corp. (Matter of SLG 810 Seventh Lessee LLC v. Tydel Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of SLG 810 Seventh Lessee LLC v Tydel Holding Corp.
2026 NY Slip Op 04384
July 9, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In the Matter of SLG 810 Seventh Lessee LLC, Petitioner-Appellant,
v
Tydel Holding Corp., Respondent-Respondent.
Decided and Entered: July 09, 2026
Index No. 652113/24|Appeal No. 7034|Case No. 2025-02305|
Before: Webber, J.P., Kennedy, Friedman, González, Shulman, JJ.
Meister Seelig & Schuster PLLC, New York (Eugene Meyers of counsel), for appellant.
Feldman Smith LLP, Tarrytown (Michael H. Smith of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joel M. Cohen, J.), entered March 17, 2025, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered September 18, 2024, which denied in part the petition to confirm a final arbitration award, unanimously modified, on the law, to remand the matter to arbitration for further proceedings consistent with this order, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
"Supreme Court is empowered to undertake the ministerial act of computing what, if any, amount is due pursuant to a clear arbitration award" (Matter of Leopold v Dabakarov, 194 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 37 NY3d 1045 [2021], citing Morgan Guar. Trust Co. of N.Y. v Solow, 114 AD2d 818, 822 [1st Dept 1985], affd 68 NY2d 779 [1986]). Here, while the arbitration panel concluded that petitioner, the landlord, is entitled to repayment of unpaid rent and property taxes as set forth in the sublease agreement, with statutory interest, respondent, the tenant, is correct that the final arbitration award left unresolved factual and legal questions such as the effect of the tenant's surrender of the premises, whether future rent obligations survived termination of the sublease, the duration of interest accrual, and the calculation of post-award obligations (see e.g. Hamilton Partners v Singer, 290 AD2d 316, 316-317 [1st Dept 2002]). Accordingly, we remand this matter to arbitration for resolution of those outstanding issues and to calculate the specific amounts due under the award (see Matter of Leopold, 194 AD3d at 487).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: July 9, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matter of SLG 810 Seventh Lessee LLC v. Tydel Holding Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-slg-810-seventh-lessee-llc-v-tydel-holding-corp-nyappdiv-2026.