Matter of Singh v. Allstate Ins. Co.

137 A.D.3d 1046, 27 N.Y.S.3d 621
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 2016
Docket2015-00806
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 137 A.D.3d 1046 (Matter of Singh v. Allstate Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Singh v. Allstate Ins. Co., 137 A.D.3d 1046, 27 N.Y.S.3d 621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate four master arbitration awards, all dated July 28, 2014, which affirmed four arbitration awards, all dated April 14, 2014, denying the petitioner’s no-fault claims for lost wages incurred as a result of an automobile accident, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered December 15, 2014, which denied her petition to vacate the four master arbitration awards and confirmed the four master arbitration awards.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*1047 “ ‘Consistent with the public policy in favor of arbitration, the grounds specified in CPLR 7511 for vacating or modifying a no-fault arbitration award are few in number and narrowly applied’” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Westchester Med. Group, M.D., 125 AD3d 649, 650 [2015], quoting Matter of Mercury Cas. Co. v Healthmakers Med. Group, P.C., 67 AD3d 1017, 1017 [2009]). Here, the petitioner failed to demonstrate any ground for vacating the subject master arbitration awards. In addition, the determinations of the master arbitrator confirming the original arbitration awards had evidentiary support and a rational basis (see Matter of Smith [Firemen’s Ins. Co.], 55 NY2d 224, 231-232 [1982]; Matter of Petrofsky [Allstate Ins. Co.], 54 NY2d 207, 211 [1981]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and confirmed the master arbitration awards.

Rivera, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ENS Med., P.C. v. Nationwide Ins. Co.
2026 NY Slip Op 26033 (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2026)
Matter of American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Atlantic Med. Care, P.C.
2025 NY Slip Op 07297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Fill Rx NY, Inc. v. LM Gen. Ins. Co.
2025 NY Slip Op 04785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Acuhealth Acupuncture, P.C. v. New York City Tr. Auth.
2018 NY Slip Op 8641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Acuhealth Acupuncture, P.C. v. Country-Wide Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 2785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.D.3d 1046, 27 N.Y.S.3d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-singh-v-allstate-ins-co-nyappdiv-2016.