MATTER OF SIMMONS v. Herkommer
This text of 465 N.E.2d 38 (MATTER OF SIMMONS v. Herkommer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The presumption created by section 207-k of the General Municipal Law is rebuttable (Matter of Uniformed Firefighters Assn. v Beekman, 52 NY2d 463, 472-473). The expert opinion of the Medical Board constituted competent evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption (Matter of Ferrigno v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 48 NY2d 788) and it was for the Board of Trustees to determine whether that opinion or the one offered by the petitioner’s expert was to be credited.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 N.E.2d 38, 62 N.Y.2d 711, 476 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-simmons-v-herkommer-ny-1984.