Matter of Sherman v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of the State of New York
225 N.E.2d 559, 19 N.Y.2d 679, 278 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1729
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the conduct of petitioner, as charged and found, does not constitute fraud or deceit within paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 6514 of the Education Law. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scilefpi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Sherman v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of the State of New York, 225 N.E.2d 559, 19 N.Y.2d 679, 278 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1729 (N.Y. 1967).
225 N.E.2d 559 (Matter of Sherman v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of the State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adler v. Bureau of Professional Medical Conduct
211 A.D.2d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Cooke v. New York State Education Department
162 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Mussalli v. Board of Regents of the University of State of New York
159 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Brestin v. Commissioner of Education
116 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)