Matter of Sherman J. v. Betty J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Sherman J. v. Betty J.

2017 NY Slip Op 9240, 156 A.D.3d 557, 65 N.Y.S.3d 701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 2017

Docket5281

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 9240 (Matter of Sherman J. v. Betty J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Sherman J. v. Betty J., 2017 NY Slip Op 9240, 156 A.D.3d 557, 65 N.Y.S.3d 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (J. Machelle Sweeting, J.), entered on or about May 1, 2017, which authorized petitioner to access his former residence on a specified date and time in order to retrieve personal belongings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by petitioner’s assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. In fact, the Family Court’s order provided petitioner with the exact relief that he was seeking.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (J. Machelle Sweeting, J.), entered on or about May 1, 2017, which authorized petitioner to access his former residence on a specified date and time in order to retrieve personal belongings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by petitioner’s assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. In fact, the Family Court’s order provided petitioner with the exact relief that he was seeking.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 9240, 156 A.D.3d 557, 65 N.Y.S.3d 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sherman-j-v-betty-j-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack