Matter of Shapiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Shapiro

136 A.D.3d 408, 23 N.Y.S.3d 878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 2016

Docket77 92216/06

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 408 (Matter of Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Shapiro, 136 A.D.3d 408, 23 N.Y.S.3d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered April 22, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, confirmed the report of the court examiner and approved the examiner’s commission and fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner Madelaine Barotz has failed to show that the court examiner’s report failed to meet the substantive requirements of the Mental Hygiene Law.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered April 22, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, confirmed the report of the court examiner and approved the examiner’s commission and fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner Madelaine Barotz has failed to show that the court examiner’s report failed to meet the substantive requirements of the Mental Hygiene Law.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.3d 408, 23 N.Y.S.3d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-shapiro-nyappdiv-2016.