MATTER OF SEROTA BROWN COURT II, LLC v. Town of Hempstead

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF SEROTA BROWN COURT II, LLC v. Town of Hempstead

918 N.E.2d 957, 13 N.Y.3d 832, 890 N.Y.S.2d 442, 2009 NY Slip Op 86999, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4002

DecidedOctober 27, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 918 N.E.2d 957 (MATTER OF SEROTA BROWN COURT II, LLC v. Town of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF SEROTA BROWN COURT II, LLC v. Town of Hempstead, 918 N.E.2d 957, 13 N.Y.3d 832, 890 N.Y.S.2d 442, 2009 NY Slip Op 86999, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4002 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondents Town of Hempstead, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, and the Department of Buildings of the Town of Hempstead, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2009 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by the Town Board of the Town of Hemp-stead, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that, among other things, denied its motion to *833 intervene, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, dismissed upon the ground that movant is not a party to this proceeding. Motion by Oceanside Cove Homeowners Association and the Alhambra Condominium for leave to intervene herein denied. Motion by Oceanside Cove Homeowners Association and the Alhambra Condominium, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2009 Appellate Division order that, among other things, denied their motion to intervene, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, dismissed upon the ground that movants are not parties to this proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondents Town of Hempstead, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, and the Department of Buildings of the Town of Hempstead, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2009 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by the Town Board of the Town of Hemp-stead, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that, among other things, denied its motion to *833 intervene, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, dismissed upon the ground that movant is not a party to this proceeding. Motion by Oceanside Cove Homeowners Association and the Alhambra Condominium for leave to intervene herein denied. Motion by Oceanside Cove Homeowners Association and the Alhambra Condominium, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2009 Appellate Division order that, among other things, denied their motion to intervene, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, dismissed upon the ground that movants are not parties to this proceeding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

918 N.E.2d 957, 13 N.Y.3d 832, 890 N.Y.S.2d 442, 2009 NY Slip Op 86999, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-serota-brown-court-ii-llc-v-town-of-hempstead-ny-2009.