Matter of Seradzky

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Matter of Seradzky

978 A.2d 921, 200 N.J. 230

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 24, 2009

DocketD-160 September Term 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 978 A.2d 921 (Matter of Seradzky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Seradzky, 978 A.2d 921, 200 N.J. 230 (N.J. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 09-024, concluding that EDWARD S. SERADZKY of BLOOMFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds) and RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with recordkeeping provisions of Rule 1:21-6), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD S. SERADZKY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI