Matter of Seiler v. Crandall
2021 NY Slip Op 00782, 191 A.D.3d 1405, 137 N.Y.S.3d 809
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matter of Seiler v. Crandall. Read the opinion of the Court — 188 A.D.3d 1614 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 2021·No. MOTION NO. (620/20) OP 19-02250.·Published
Opinion
Matter of Seiler v Crandall (2021 NY Slip Op 00782)
Decided on February 5, 2021
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Feb. 5, 2021.)
MOTION NO. (620/20) OP 19-02250.
| Matter of Seiler v Crandall |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 00782 |
| Decided on February 5, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 5, 2021
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Feb. 5, 2021.)
MOTION NO. (620/20) OP 19-02250.
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF BRIAN SEILER, PETITIONER, HON.
v
JOHN H. CRANDALL, AS ACTING HERKIMER COUNTY COURT JUDGE, LETITIA JAMES, NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY S. CARPENTER, AS HERKIMER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND SCHUYLER TOWN COURT, RESPONDENTS.
v
JOHN H. CRANDALL, AS ACTING HERKIMER COUNTY COURT JUDGE, LETITIA JAMES, NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFREY S. CARPENTER, AS HERKIMER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND SCHUYLER TOWN COURT, RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Seiler v. Crandall, 2021 NY Slip Op 00782, 191 A.D.3d 1405, 137 N.Y.S.3d 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).
2021 NY Slip Op 00782 (Matter of Seiler v. Crandall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 431
New York JUD § 431