Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v. Town of Brighton Planning Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v. Town of Brighton Planning Bd.

2022 NY Slip Op 05409

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2022·No. 614 CA 21-01441·Published

Opinion

Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton Planning Bd. (2022 NY Slip Op 05409)

Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton Planning Bd.

2022 NY Slip Op 05409

Decided on September 30, 2022

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

614 CA 21-01441

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SAVE MONROE AVE., INC., 2900 MONROE AVE., LLC, CLIFFORDS OF PITTSFORD, L.P., ELEXCO LAND SERVICES, INC., JULIA D. KOPP, MARK BOYLAN, ANNE BOYLAN AND STEVEN M. DEPERRIOR, PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 7.)

HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (AARON M. SAYKIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, AND TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, AND THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered September 9, 2021. The order denied the motion of petitioners-plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Brighton Grassroots, LLC v Town of Brighton Planning Bd. ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Sept. 30, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).

Entered: September 30, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton Planning Bd. (2022 NY Slip Op 05409)

Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton Planning Bd.

2022 NY Slip Op 05409

Decided on September 30, 2022

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

614 CA 21-01441

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SAVE MONROE AVE., INC., 2900 MONROE AVE., LLC, CLIFFORDS OF PITTSFORD, L.P., ELEXCO LAND SERVICES, INC., JULIA D. KOPP, MARK BOYLAN, ANNE BOYLAN AND STEVEN M. DEPERRIOR, PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 7.)

HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (AARON M. SAYKIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, AND TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, AND THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered September 9, 2021. The order denied the motion of petitioners-plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Brighton Grassroots, LLC v Town of Brighton Planning Bd. ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Sept. 30, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).

Entered: September 30, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v. Town of Brighton Planning Bd., 2022 NY Slip Op 05409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

2022 NY Slip Op 05409 (Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v. Town of Brighton Planning Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related