Matter of Santo v. Symington Machine Company

189 N.E. 698, 263 N.Y. 563, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 854
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended so as to provide that the order is affirmed “ with costs to the claimant and the State Industrial Board.” (See 262 N. Y. 660; 263 N. Y. 663.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Santo v. Symington Machine Company, 189 N.E. 698, 263 N.Y. 563, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 854 (N.Y. 1933).

189 N.E. 698 (Matter of Santo v. Symington Machine Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Gordon v. New York Life Insurance
93 N.E.2d 453 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)